For our September issue we would like to see papers on Classification.
CIG recently ran a successful event called “Thinking about classification” and we would like to take another look at classification in September’s issue of C&I. Do you have something to say about classification? Have you inherited an in-house classification scheme that you love/hate? Have you had to reclassify a library or collection, or are thinking of embarking on a reclassification project in the future? What do you wish you had learnt about classification when you studied LIS or what professional training in classification would you like to be available? Have you been to an interesting classification event recently or encountered a good classification book? Have you designed your own classification scheme? Do you use multiple classification schemes in your library and want to share your experiences of these? Have you got some interesting experiences of making your classification more localised or more standardised? How do you think your library users utilise your classification? Do you have any thoughts about unethical classification and problematic terminology or structures?
We welcome papers on these or any other aspect of classification for this issue. Papers can be up to 2,000 words and should be submitted by the end of August.
Please contact the editors with your proposal.
For more information please see our guidance for contributors:
The new issue of C&I (187) is now available here.
The latest issue of C&I discusses how metadata and institutional repositories can work together. You’ll also find a review of David Stuart’s “Practical ontologies for information professionals“.
The next issue of C&I will focus on the following theme: 187 (June): Institutional repositories
Feedback from the CIG conference indicated that people were interested in learning more about metadata work within institutional repositories (IR). Does your job include working on an IR? How does this complement your traditional cataloguing work? Do you work entirely on an IR, and if so, do you consider yourself a cataloguer, metadata specialist, or something else? What was your and your team’s job route into working on an IR? Did you help set up an IR, or are about to do so? What tips, hints, and pitfalls can you offer about setting up an IR? Do you have a non-cataloguing/non-metadata role related to an IR, and would like to share your thoughts about their value, especially related to how you use your IR?
We welcome papers on any aspects of institutional repositories. Please contact us with proposals; we would expect completed papers to be submitted by the end of May.
Please contact the editors (Karen Pierce: PierceKF@Cardiff.ac.uk and Deborah Lee: email@example.com) if you have any queries, or if you want to offer a paper that does not fit into the theme mentioned. We are always happy to consider papers on topics unrelated to an issue’s theme, especially if it is the result of some research you have conducted, or a project you have been involved in. Papers can be up to 2,000 words, and we are happy to include a selection of images.
Please check our guidance for contributors: http://www.cilip.org.uk/cataloguing-indexing-group/catalogue-index/guidance-contributors
The next issue of C&I will focus on the following theme: 186 (March): The future of cataloguing
What do you think the future of cataloguing is shaping up to be? What do you want it to include? Is MARC dead? How do you view Bibframe? How do you get the best out of your discovery layer? Who will perform cataloguing tasks in your institution, is temping the way forward?
We all have many questions about the future of cataloguing (and perhaps our own jobs), this issue is the opportunity to explore some of these areas. We welcome papers on all of the topics mentioned, and anything else that falls within the theme. Papers should be submitted by the end of February.
Please contact the editors (Karen Pierce: PierceKF@Cardiff.ac.uk and Deborah Lee: firstname.lastname@example.org) if you have any queries, or if you want to offer a paper that does not fit into the theme mentioned. We are always happy to consider papers on topics unrelated to an issue’s theme, especially if it is the result of some research you have conducted, or a project you have been involved in. Papers can be up to 2,000 words, and we are happy to include a selection of images. Please check our guidance for contributors: http://www.cilip.org.uk/cataloguing-indexing-group/catalogue-index/guidance-contributors
The new issue of C&I is now available here.
This is a bumper issue containing a selection of papers from our 2016 conference on the theme of Innovation and Discovery. The issue also features a report on the recent Equality and Diversity report produced as part of the CILIP Leadership Project.
The new issue of C&I is now available here.
This issue is themed around research and contains articles on female book collectors of the nineteenth century, compiling a catalogue for the Ladybird books and book collectors at Cambridge University Library. The issue also features a report from the recent CIG 2016 Conference.
CIG is pleased to announce that the presentations from our 2016 conference ‘Innovation and Discovery’ are now available via the CILIP website. Slides, workshop materials and posters can all be found here.