March 2018, Issue 190: Contemplating cataloguing, classification and indexing research
This issue will focus on the process of doing research in the cataloguing, classification and metadata fields. Sample topics might include, the process of submitting conference proposals, getting your work published, methodologies used for doing cataloguing-related research, useful journals for cataloguing indexing, experiences of doing research projects. So, do you have any thoughts, experiences, or advice to share?
Could you write about giving your first-ever conference paper or writing your first article?
How do you prepare your conference papers, and do you have any tips for the cataloguing community?
What are your go-to-journal in this area and why?
Which books do you find useful?
How did you write that all-important cataloguing survey (or, do you have experience writing good surveys and want to share this with the cataloguing community)?
What do you think about practitioners doing research and/or how did you persuade your manager it was a good thing to do?
Have you done a cataloguing or classification related LIS dissertation recently and want to share how you went about doing your research?
What do you think are the important research questions in cataloguing and classification right now (i.e. what would it be useful for us to know as a profession?).
What are the ethical considerations of doing cataloguing-related research?
Please contact the editors (Karen Pierce: PierceKF@Cardiff.ac.uk and Deborah Lee: Deborah.Lee@courtauld.ac.uk if you would like to write a paper for this issue, and we will send you more information. Please also contact the editors if you have any queries or if you want to offer a paper that does not fit into the theme mentioned. We are always happy to consider papers on topics unrelated to an issue’s theme, especially if it is the result of some research you have conducted, or a project you have been involved in. Papers can be up to 2,000 words, and we are happy to include a selection of images. Please check our guidance for contributors: https://archive.cilip.org.uk/cataloguing-indexing-group/catalogue-index/guidance-contributors. Papers will be due on 28th February.
Training Bursary – Library Juice Online Course – Dewey Decimal Classification
Already thinking about CPD for 2018? Would you like to enhance your Dewey classification skills?
CIG is offering 1 free registration on the Dewey Decimal Classification course which runs between February 5th – March 2nd 2018.
You will learn how to:
Analyse the subject matter of resources in order to assign Dewey numbers.
Use Web Dewey (trial access is included for the duration of the course) to find, select and build Dewey numbers.
Use Dewey tables to add depth to classification numbers.
Make confident decisions when classifying resources that straddle subject areas.
Critically analyse Dewey numbers in copy cataloguing records.
The course is taught asynchronously so that you can fit your study around your work/life commitments. Tuition is via readings, assignments and an online discussion forum.
You will also receive a certificate on successful completion of the course.
How to apply:
To apply for the free registration you must be a CIG member (although CILIP membership is not required.) The application (approx. 200 words) should demonstrate why you would like to enrol; how you would use this training opportunity to highlight or promote CIG’s special areas of interest; and why you would not be able to enrol without CIG sponsorship.
If you are successful you will be required to write about your experience of the course and its’ content. Your report, or summary, will be shared with CIG members via the CIG blog and/or our professional journal.
Proposals are invited for the CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group (CIG) biennial conference “Metadata: Create, Share and Enrich” to be held from 5-7 September 2018 at the John McIntyre Conference Centre in Edinburgh, Scotland.
This year’s conference aims to showcase the continued need for quality metadata in a data dominated world and those who create, share, enrich and use it. We encourage submissions from information professionals, data suppliers, data researchers, standards and system developers on this theme and active audience participation.
If you want to find out more about the call for proposals please visit our page discussing in length conference topics, formats, submissions and submissions deadline.
Do you use and/or have an interest in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)? Are you interested in playing a part in the development of DDC?
The UK DDC User Forum is looking for new members. The Forum meets once a year to discuss proposed changes to the DDC, feeding back the views of the UK user community to the International Editorial Policy Committee. We would welcome expressions of interest from anyone based in the UK, especially from those working in the public library sector and/or from institutions in Northern Ireland or Wales, as these areas are currently under-represented.
For those who are interested in becoming new members, you have 2 choices:
If you have any informal questions about membership, then in the first instance please email: Deborah Lee (firstname.lastname@example.org).
To apply, please email: the Chair, Terrance Mann (Terrance.Mann@bl.uk), with supporting information about your current role and location, DDC experience and any particular subject expertise. The deadline for applications is Friday 16 February 2018.
Classification is the theme of this bumper issue of Catalogue and Index. There was a tremendous response to the call for papers, illustrating the importance and interest in classification to the U.K. cataloguing and metadata community. The classification discussed in this issue comes in many flavours, including the usage of classification schemes, digital tools for classification, the theory of classification, reclassification, and much more besides.
Join Backstage Library Works either in London or Edinburgh this September for a half-day seminar on managing collections and metadata in libraries.
Managing an institution’s collections and metadata can be a huge task. Librarians and archivists feel pressure to continually improve workflows, delivering better service to patrons and researchers.
At the same time, many are being asked to create efficiencies, to find new ways to accomplish more with existing resources.
Librarians at leading institutions are tackling these challenges in innovative ways. We’ve invited a few to discuss their current and future plans with you.
Reclassification of library collections can speed up an acquisitions workflow and reduce processing costs for new items. Still, the task of changing class marks in the metadata, then relabeling and juggling the physical location of every book in the library can be overwhelming.
Metadata workflows can be fine-tuned to streamline processes and improve discovery in your catalogue, but changes often require the coordinated efforts of several departments to overcome institutional inertia.
Digital access to archival collections is expanding at a thrilling rate. However, the next fifty thousand images are only as useful as the metadata that patrons will search to find the content they want.
Tuesday, 12 September 2017, in London
Thursday, 14 September 2017, in Edinburgh
Save the Date:
Mark your calendar and stay tuned for registration details and programme announcements.
For our September issue we would like to see papers on Classification.
CIG recently ran a successful event called “Thinking about classification” and we would like to take another look at classification in September’s issue of C&I. Do you have something to say about classification? Have you inherited an in-house classification scheme that you love/hate? Have you had to reclassify a library or collection, or are thinking of embarking on a reclassification project in the future? What do you wish you had learnt about classification when you studied LIS or what professional training in classification would you like to be available? Have you been to an interesting classification event recently or encountered a good classification book? Have you designed your own classification scheme? Do you use multiple classification schemes in your library and want to share your experiences of these? Have you got some interesting experiences of making your classification more localised or more standardised? How do you think your library users utilise your classification? Do you have any thoughts about unethical classification and problematic terminology or structures?
We welcome papers on these or any other aspect of classification for this issue. Papers can be up to 2,000 words and should be submitted by the end of August.
Please contact the editors with your proposal.
For more information please see our guidance for contributors: